
A digital workplace definition
‘Digital workplace’ is the concept that there is a virtual equivalent to the physical workplace, and that this needs to be planned and managed coherently because it is fundamental to people’s productivity, engagement and working health.
This is not a precise definition; just as the notion of ‘workplace’ itself has ill-defined boundaries, so the shape of a digital workplace will vary between organisations. However, at its heart it is about:
- Putting people first – the impact on employees is what makes the digital workplace important.
- A technology layer – advances in technology are driving changes in the digital workplace, and this is what makes it a current issue.
- Management and design – proactively developing a digital workplace means addressing it as a whole and co-ordinating between technology, process and people aspects.
The digital workplace provides an organisation with five services or capabilities (see the outer ring of the figure above):
- Communication and employee engagement
- Collaboration
- Finding and sharing of information and knowledge
- Business applications (process specific tools and employee self-service)
- Agile working – the ability to be productive any time and place
To work well, these need the be supported by five management activities (the inner pie of the figure above):
- Strategic planning
- Governance and operational management
- Proactive support for adoption
- High quality user experience
- Robust, secure and flexible technology
This is deliberately a non-prescriptive model. It doesn’t say you have to have a social intranet, Yammer, tablet applications or any other specific technologies. What is used to deliver each service will vary over time and by organisational need.
There are other good definitions available too, including those from Jane McConnell, Chris Tubb and Oscar Berg. Gartner has a definition that also usefully emphasises a consumer-driven viewpoint:
“The digital workplace is an ongoing, deliberate approach to delivering a more consumer-like computing environment that is better able to facilitate innovative and flexible working practices.” ~ Matthew W. Cain, Gartner
Comparing the digital workplace with the consumer experience is illuminating right now because the gap is so large. This helps to bring home what is currently missing from the work environment. Hopefully this gap will close and won’t be an enduring characteristic.
Digital workplace technology
The visible parts of the digital workplace are technologies and ways of working that allow people to connect, collaborate, communicate and co-operate without necessarily being together face to face.
A 2012 paper1 by Deloitte put it well:
“The digital workplace encompasses all the technologies people use to get work done in today’s workplace… It ranges from your HR applications and core business applications to e-mail, instant messaging and enterprise social media tools and virtual meeting tools.” ~ Deloitte
Email, intranets and web conferencing are typical components, but what makes the digital workplace more than a collective noun for these parts is the emphasis on thinking about how they come together from an employee’s point of view.
There are some elements that fit the broad definition above but which tend not to be discussed often. For example, PCs and traditional business systems like SAP, PeopleSoft, databases and CRM are all part of the non-physical workplace. They perhaps get overlooked because they are an accepted part of the fabric of most businesses, however, they are part of what should be considered within a digital workplace strategy, at least from an alignment point of view.
What the digital workplace is not
It’s not a fancy re-naming of intranets. Your digital workplace may not have an intranet at all. Although intranets commonly feature, we need to get away from the idea of collaboration, communication etc. all happening in one platform.
It’s not about social networks, social or mobile intranets. All of these are current trends that can form some elements of a digital workplace, but if developed in isolation from the rest of an employee’s working world, particularly legacy systems on which people still rely, then the point has been missed.
It’s not about social business or social enterprise. Social Enterprise and its variants such as is a The Responsive Organization are a prescriptive vision for how companies should be run. A highly social digital workplace would be part of this, but there’s nothing intrinsic to the digital workplace concept that dictates this (or guarantees that it will happen).
Why it matters
An effective digital workplace decouples work from a physical location for much of the time. This freeing up of work has several important implications not just about where people work, but how teams are formed and how people come together to solve ad-hoc problems. Potentially, it can also close the arbitrary gap between white and blue collar workers by giving both equal digital access2. Microsoft’s Western Europe VP put it well:
“Businesses that will be successful in the future will be those who break down the barriers between people, workplaces and technologies and empower their employees to be productive and creative wherever they are… IT is a catalyst for new ways of working, but competitive advantage increasingly comes from letting employees use technology in the way they want to. This requires a business culture that puts people first.” ~ Klaus Holse, Microsoft, HR Magazine 29 Feb 2012
1 The digital workplace: Think, share, do. Deloitte, 2012/2013.
2 Thanks to Jane McConnell for emphasising this in response to the CMSWire version of this article.
Pingback: Quels composants et challenges pour la #digitalworkplace ? | E-media, the Econocom blog
Pingback: A digital workplace definition | Blog | Thomas Maeder
Neil Ward-Dutton
I like the way you were clear that this is not just about intranets, or social tech, or any other one specific thing for that matter.
I do think it’s a bit of a shame that you have ‘business applications’ as a kind of vague catch-all in your diagram though. It feels like a bit of a cop-out.
The other 4 elements are more capabilities; ‘business applications’ feels more like ‘terra incognita’. I think we should be able to do better than that!
Particularly when the lines are blurring so much. Consider that – just as an example – a growing number of Salesforce.com clients use Chatter as a part of their CRM implementations.
All good brain-food for the debate though!
Sam Marshall
Hi Neil,
Many thanks for your comment. I see the framework as very much work in progress, so I’d certainly welcome ideas on ways to refine the ‘business applications’ dimension if you have any suggestions? I agree it’s a tricky area to reflect in a generic model. For a specific industry it’s easier as that dimension can be much more specific, for example ERP in manufacturing, electronic lab notebooks in R&D etc. So when we use the model with clients we tune it in this way.
However, we shouldn’t let the vendors artificially blur the lines – Chatter is just a tool providing social capabilities that happens to be sold by a CRM company, there’s nothing intrinsic to Chatter that makes it about CRM, and that’s partly the message that I use the model in this post to get across to clients.
Pingback: L’evoluzione del posto di lavoro digitale | E-media, il Econocom Blog
Pingback: "I am not a (phone) number" - Being yourself in the digital workplace | Interact Intranet Software
Pingback: Hubs, Hives and Hangouts: Adapting Your Digital Workplace
Pingback: Social Networks Don't Need Management's Blessing
Pingback: Digital workplace as a solution for business continuity – Blog about Information Systems and Digital Transformation